Sharp v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

10 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(a) A pharmacist shall hold in strictest confidence all prescriptions, drug orders, records, and patient information. He may divulge such information only when it is in the best interest of the patient or when requested by the [Board of Pharmacy] or its representatives or by a law enforcement officer charged with enforcement of law pertaining to drugs or devices or the practice of pharmacy. (b) A person with knowledge by virtue of his office of any prescription drug order, record, or patient information may not divulge such information except in connection with a criminal prosecution or proceeding or proceeding before the board, to which the person to whom the information relates is a party.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Williams v. State

2. “"The words 'should have been charged' must be read in conjunction with Indiana's joinder statute, Ind.Code 35-34-1-9, which is permissive and does not necessarily require the State to join all offenses from the same time period in one information or indictment. - See State v. Burke (1988) 3d Dist.Ind.App., 443 N.E.2d 859 ."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Gregory v. State

3. “[w]e have examined the information against [Sharp] in the prior proceeding, and determine the [Sharp’s] argument is without merit. The information shows that the conspiracies were not included as - charged and there is no violation of double jeopardy.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Sharp v. State