Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 569 P2D 1022 - Faubion v. State

Faubion v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently December 2008

19 state decisions

1301977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dodson v. State · 87 Okla. Crim. 313 - Lowrey v. State · Lemmon v. State · 6 Okla. Crim. 541 - Holmes v. State · Oxendine v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... that “a severance is not a matter of right on the part of the defendant, but rests entirely in the judgment of the trial court, and a denial of motion for severance will not be disturbed on appeal unless there is a clear showing of an abuse of discretion.” Chance v. State, 539 P.2d 412, 416 (Okl.Cr.1975). See, Lemmon v. State, 538 P.2d 596 (Okl.Cr.1975); Haynes v. State, 532 P.2d 1390 (Okl.Cr.1975); Grimes v. State, 528 P.2d 1397 (Okl.Cr.1974). Further, this Court has previously encouraged the proper use of this State’s joinder statutes, 22 O.S.1971, § 436, et seq., observing that such would operate to reduce the number of trials and the attendant expenses to the State and to the defendant. See the special concurrence to Dodson v. State, 562 P.2d 916 (Okl.Cr.1977), wherein the views of this Court were set out concerning the application of 22 O.S.1971, § 436, et seq., and the protection incorporated therein.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “since the prior conviction upon which enhancement was based was not obtained under the same section as was the conviction for the instant case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[the language 'under this section' refers only to the second or subsequent of fense,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.