Hannie v. Wall’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rayne State Bank & Trust Co. v. Nat. Union Fire Ins. Co. · Cherokee Restaurant, Inc. v. Pierson · Simmons v. Simmons · 431 So. 2d 773 - State v. Andrews · 399 So. 2d 1216 - Ditch v. Finkelstein
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... an agreement between two or more person, who, for preventing or putting an end to a lawsuit, adjust their differences by mutual consent, in the manner in which they agree on....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the insured and the insurer not only share the same quality as parties, but in essence their identities are virtually merged into one, to the extent of the policy limits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.