Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 569 SO2D 110 - State v. Brady

State v. Brady’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 2017

5 state decisions

30199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mincey v. Arizona · Horton v. California · Scharffe v. Perkins · Marquez v. Texas · Thompson v. Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although the officers had a prior justification for being in the area of the bathroom, attending to the body of the victim, it cannot be said that the officers discovered these items in `plain view' because Det. Demma had to open the door to the closet in order to find them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.