569 So. 2d 1225 - Floyd v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
95 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 96 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Ware v. State (2000), 608 So. 2d 784 - Fotopoulos v. State (1992)
95 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · Wingo v. Wedding · Tamotsu Tanaka v. Creditors' Committee 1 · Paulussen v. Herion · Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Once the state has proffered a facially race-neutral reason, a defendant must place the court on notice that he or she contests the factual existence of the reason.”
14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ratliff v. State · Austin v. State“(1) The witness cannot readily, and with equal accuracy and adequacy, communicate what he or she has perceived to the trier of fact without testifying in terms of inferences or opinions and the witness’s use of inferences or opinions will not mislead the trier of fact to the prejudice of the objecting party; and (2) The opinions and inferences do not require a special knowledge, skill, experience, or training.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Lay witness opinion testimony is admissible if it is within the ken of an intelligent person with a degree of experience.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.