Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 569 SO2D 1247 - Huff v. State

Huff v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

106
cited by 106 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

106 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 106 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably 622 So. 2d 982 - Huff v. State (1993), 732 So. 2d 1065 - Banks v. State (1999)

106 state decisions

460199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · Reading Co. v. CJI Industries, Inc. · Delno v. Market St. Ry. Co. · 101 So. 2d 123 - West Shore Restaurant Corp. v. Turk · 508 So. 2d 778 - Ward v. Dugger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 106 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[D]iscretion is abused only where no reasonable man would take the view adopted by the trial court.”
    33 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If a writ of certiorari is filed with the United States Supreme Court, the two-year time period does not begin to run until the writ is finally determined.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A practicing attorney of another state, in good standing, who has professional business in a court of record of this state may, upon motion, be permitted to practice for the purpose of such business upon such conditions as the court deems appropriate under the circumstances of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.