Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 569 So. 2d 1329 - Spadafora v. Carlo

569 So. 2d 1329 - Spadafora v. Carlo’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 2018

10 state decisions

60199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 351 So. 2d 29 - Wills v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. · In re Amendment to Florida Probate Rule—Part III (Guardianship) · Wood v. Camp · Slavin v. Kay · 433 So. 2d 491 - Orlando Executive Park, Inc. v. Robbins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) to use reasonable care in maintaining the premises in a reasonably safe condition; and (2) to give the invitee warning of concealed perils which are or should be known to the landowner, and which are unknown to the invitee and cannot be discovered by him through the exercise of due care.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.