¶1Ronnie Jerome Williams appeals his judgment and sentence for possession of cocaine, sale of cocaine, and conspiracy to sell cocaine, and raises three issues on appeal: (1) Whether the trial court erred in allowing the introduction of similar-fact evidence; (2) whether the evidence supports a conviction for conspiracy to sell cocaine; (3) whether the appellant can legally be convicted and sentenced for both possession and sale of cocaine arising from the same transaction.
¶2We affirm issues 1 and 2 without comment. We affirm issue 3 in accord with our decision in St. Fabre v. State, 548 So.2d 797 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), acknowledging conflict with V.A.A. v. State, 561 So.2d 314 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1990).
¶3AFFIRMED.