¶1Appellant was charged with one count of possession of cocaine. After her motion for suppression of physical evidence was denied, she entered a plea of nolo conten-dere to the charge. Although she timely seeks review of the trial court’s order denying her motion to suppress physical evidence, there is no evidence in the record that she ever reserved the right to appeal or withdrew her plea. Therefore, we are without jurisdiction to hear the matter as she has no right to direct appeal. § 924.06(3), Fla.Stat. (1989); Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979); Beasley v. State, 425 So.2d 216 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Hall v. State, 397 So.2d 1041 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). The appeal is dismissed.
569 So. 2d 1386
Patterson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 28, 1990
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1990-11-28
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1999
1 state decisions
Relies on Gissendanner v. State · Hall v. State · 425 So. 2d 216 - Beasley v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1990-11-28
View the full empirical analysis of this case →