Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 569 SO2D 163 - State v. Jarvis

State v. Jarvis’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 1996
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Sepulvado · 384 So. 2d 355 - State v. Bonanno · King v. Lynaugh · Wrenn v. Benson · 448 So. 2d 645 - State v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We do not consider that identity of name of defendant and the person previously convicted is sufficient evidence of identity. Identification of the accused may be by testimony of witnesses, by expert opinion as to the fingerprints of the accused when compared with those in the prison record introduced, or by photographs contained in the duly authenticated record. [footnote omitted].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.