Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 569 SO2D 169 - State v. Shoemaker

State v. Shoemaker’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 1999
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Logiudice v. Georgia · 441 So. 2d 1195 - State v. Belton · 434 So. 2d 389 - State v. Andrishok · State v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The fourth amendment to the federal constitution and art. 1 § 5, of the Louisiana Constitution protect people against unreasonable searches and seizures. However, the right of law enforcement officers to stop and interrogate one reasonably suspected of criminal conduct is recognized by La.Code Crim.P. art. 215.1, as well as by both state and federal jurisprudence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The right to make an investigatory stop and question the particular individual detained must be based upon reasonable cause to believe that he has been, is, or is about to be engaged in criminal conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.