Seay v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2009
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Michaleski v. Western Preferred Cas. Co. · Brumfield v. Dyson · Stephens v. Justiss-Mears Oil Co. · 521 So. 2d 399 - Ducote v. Albert · Thomas v. RPM Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The fact that the employer occasionally provides transportation to accommodate an employee is not enough to bring the situation within the exception to the general rule that trips to and from the place of work are outside the course of employment.... In view of the informal character of hiring agreements, the undertaking to provide transportation must usually be implied from the circumstances. For this reason, the fact that there is a prevailing practice of carrying employees back and forth is important, and the fact that such trips have been made only infrequently or irregularly has been regarded as an indication that the arrangement is one of accommodation only. [Footnote omitted.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.