569 So. 2d 570 - State v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

cited by 27 later decisions

states following

February 2013

most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently February 2013 · most notably 823 So. 2d 877 - State v. Bridgewater (2002), 609 So. 2d 1078 - State v. Thomas (1992)

1 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Rideout v. United States · Castaneda v. Partida · Alexander v. Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“direct bearing on the make-up of the general venire, from which the grand jury venire is randomly drawn, and the grand jury foreman is selected.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Campbell · 763 So. 2d 1 - State Ex Rel. Roper v. Cain
“the defendant failed to show the percentage of minority persons in the general or grand jury venires, or the percentage of qualified minority persons in the general population, therefore, the trial judge was correct in finding that the defendant had not made the required prima facie case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 779 So. 2d 675 - State v. Cosey · 813 So. 2d 356 - State v. Langley
“As to the five ultimately selected to sit on the petit jury, the individual questioning by the trial judge supports the conclusion that although the jurors had suffered exposure to the publicity, none were so impressed by it as to be incapable of rendering a fair and impartial verdict”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 692 So. 2d 1051 - State v. Banks · 823 So. 2d 877 - State v. Bridgewater

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.