Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 569 So. 2d 824 - Disinger v. State

569 So. 2d 824 - Disinger v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2003
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pennsylvania v. Ritchie · Coy v. Iowa · Kirby v. United States · Dowdell v. United States · Witt v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The trial court erred in using the screen over Disinger’s objection, but the error was one which could have been raised upon his earlier appeal. It was preserved for appeal by trial counsel’s objections, and the objections were supported by law as it existed at the time of trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.