Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 569 So. 2d 848 - Casella v. Casella

569 So. 2d 848 - Casella v. Casella’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably 965 So. 2d 1261 - Esaw v. Esaw (2007), 642 So. 2d 20 - Hirsch v. Hirsch (1994)

30 state decisions

130199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 377 So. 2d 1150 - Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee · 418 So. 2d 316 - Thomas v. Thomas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The decision of the trial court comes to an appellate court clothed in a presumption of correctness and the burden is on appellant to demonstrate reversible error. Therefore, the failure to provide either a transcript or proper substitute for one, such as a reconciliation of the facts by the parties and trial court judge, is usually fatal. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “. . . this is not to say that an award amounting to any particular percentage of a party's income forms a bright-line rule resulting in a finding of an excessive award and an abuse of discretion. Each case's resolution must rest on its individual facts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.