State v. Larrinaga’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2009
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Arizona v. Youngblood · Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · David W. McKay v. Texas · 486 So. 2d 578 - Kelley v. State · 569 So. 2d 754 - Kelley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. . . the facts are insufficient to support a finding that appellee has been or will be denied due process of law if he is tried without having the benefit of the tapes for his defense. The trial court specifically found that the police did not act in bad faith when they destroyed the videotape and this finding is factually supported. Larrinaga, supra, p. 2799 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Murphy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.