Henderson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2013
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 383 So. 2d 219 - Eutsey v. State · 564 So. 2d 480 - Cresswell v. State · Cross v. State · State v. Jimeno · Cross v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“incorrigible and dangerous character of the accused and establish[es] the necessity for enhanced restraint. In this sense, therefore, the enhanced punishment is incident to the last offense alone, but for which it would not be imposed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“1. Does it violate a defendant’s substantive due process rights when he is classified as a violent felony offender pursuant to section 775.084 and thereby subjected to an extended term of imprisonment, if he has been convicted of an enumerated violent felony within the previous five years, even though his present offense is a nonviolent felony? 2. Does section 775.084(l)(b) violate the constitutional protection against double jeopardy by increasing a defendant’s punishment due to the nature of the pri- or offense?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Maeweather v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.