Bowman v. Monsanto Co.’s Empirical Analysis
569 U.S. 278 · 2013
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Federal Circuit Court of Appeals)
Relationships
Applies 17 U.S.C. § 117 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 35 U.S.C. § 154 · 7 U.S.C. § 1571 · 7 U.S.C. § 2321 (Patent and Plant Variety Protection Remedy Clarification Act) · 7 U.S.C. § 2541
Relies on Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co. · United States v. Univis Lens Co. · Ag Supply Inc Farm Advantage Incs v. Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc · Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc. · Cotton-Tie Co. v. Simmons
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The exhaustion doctrine is limited to the 'particular item' sold ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.