Hillman v. Maretta’s Empirical Analysis
569 U.S. 483 · 2013
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 8701 (Federal Employees Life Insurance Improvement Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 8705 · 5 U.S.C. § 8706 · 5 U.S.C. § 8716
Relies on Hines v. Davidowitz · Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Paul · United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. · Trw Inc v. Adelaide Andrews · Wyeth v. Levine
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]here Congress explicitly enumerates certain exceptions to a general prohibition, additional exceptions are not to be implied, in the absence of evidence of a contrary legislative intent.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.