Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 A2D 627 - Labella v. Labella

Labella v. Labella’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
3
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

59 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently March 2009 · most notably Pasquariello v. Pasquariello (1975), Stoner v. Stoner (1972)

59 state decisions

2401948195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Romaine v. . Chauncey · Dunham v. Dunham · Cary v. Cary · State Ex Rel. Morris v. Bulkeley · Christiano v. Christiano

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “trial courts have a distinct advantage over an appellate court in dealing with domestic relations, where all of the surrounding circumstances and the appearance and attitude of the parties are so significant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.