Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

57 A.D.2d 731

Eelman v. Eelman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1977-04-15

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 1999

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1977-04-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Special Term granted summary judgment to plaintiff pursuant to CPLR 3213 upon the theory that her claim for support payments was based upon an instrument for the payment of money only. The remedy of accelerated summary judgment under CPLR 3213 may not be granted when the underlying instrument is a separation agreement which contains covenants and conditions relating to matters other than support payments (Wagner v Cornblum, 36 AD2d 427). (Appeal from judgment of Livingston Supreme Court—summary judgment.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Cardamone, Dillon and Goldman, JJ.

/57/ad2d/731 · .json · Public domain