Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

57 Ala. App. 167

Barton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 18, 1975

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · decided 1975-11-18

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 1979

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1975-11-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ON REHEARING

CATES, Presiding Judge.

¶2On rehearing2 appellant claims that the statement that Lassiter once saved Barton’s life was a canard.

¶3We do not think the truth of that assertion [which appears in the statement given by Barton to Pemberton quoted above, see p. 697 of this Ms] was an issue in the trial. That Pemberton wrote it out comes down to the credit to be attached to a peripheral part of his testimony. He claimed that was part of what Barton told him.

¶4Application overruled.

All the Judges concur.
/57/alaapp/167 · .json · Public domain