Harris v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 1979
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 55 Ala. App. 274 - Jones v. State · 52 Ala. App. 399 - Burleson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In this ease — because of the use of a check-out counter system — the completed act of asportation did not occur until the two thieves went past or evaded the place of payment, i. e., the designated cash register.1 Immediately after they passed that point they were halted with the goods in hand.” Harris, 57 Ala.App. at 253 , 327 So.2d at 748 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Martin v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.