Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 Ala. App. 558 - Harris v. State

57 Ala. App. 558 - Harris v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
June 1992
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently June 1992 · most notably 395 So. 2d 164 - Bland v. State (1981), 409 So. 2d 886 - Ware v. State (1981)

31 state decisions

180197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Simmons v. United States · Neil v. Biggers · Coleman v. Alabama · 96 So. 2d 424 - Griffin v. State · 39 Ala. App. 42 - Pope v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Only those grounds of objection presented to the trial court can serve as a basis for a reversal of its action.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Lineup identification conducted approximately an hour from the time, of the robbery did not give rise to substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification even though victim identified defendant as the taller one of the two that held him up and defendant’s alleged accomplice was some five inches taller than defendant. “Fairness to both the suspect and the victim should inhere in a lineup. The cards should not be stacked against either. The sooner the lineup the greater the likelihood of a correct result.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.