Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 ARKAPP 218 - Blocker v. Blocker

Blocker v. Blocker’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1999
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738A

Relies on Luedemann v. Wade · Ball v. Foehner · Leinen v. Arkansas Department of Human Services · Roberts v. Feltman

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.