In Re Pecht’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2017 · most notably Norwest Bank Worthington v. Ahlers (1988), In Re Future Energy Corp. (1988)
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1125 · 11 U.S.C. § 1126 · 11 U.S.C. § 541
Relies on Fitzsimmons v. Walsh · Buffalo Savings Bank v. Marston Enterprises, Inc. (In Re Marston Enterprises, Inc.) · In Re Landau Boat Co. · United States Fidelity & Guaranty v. Delancey (In Re Delancey) · Matter of US Truck Co., Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A contribution of new value is a condition precedent to confirmation by “cram down” over a dissenting superior class unless that class is paid in full, and allowing the proprietorship to continue operating without a contribution of new value up front would, as in Marston ( 13 B.R. 788 [514] [Bkrtcy.W.D.Mo.1981]), violate the spirit, if not the letter of Sec. 1129(b)(2)(B)(ii).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Stegall
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.