57 Cal. 232
Decided July 1, 1881
California Supreme Court · decided 1881-07-01
<p>Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, in the Twenty-third District Court, City and County of San Francisco. Thornton, J.</p>
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1888
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1881-07-01
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The judgment in this cause is affirmed. The sureties on the undertaking upon appeal were notified of the motion for judgment, and failed to appear. We see nothing in the point that § 942 of the Code of Civil Procedure, allowing judgment on motion against the sureties, where they have subscribed such an undertaking as is required by that section, is unconstitutional.
¶2Judgment affirmed.