Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 CALAPP2D 153 - People v. Bucchierre

People v. Bucchierre’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently October 2016 · most notably 63 Cal. 2d 779 - People v. Smith (1966), 58 Cal. 2d 732 - People v. Marsh (1962)

1 federal appellate · 39 state decisions

16019431950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Warren · Whitley v. Superior Court · 26 Cal. App. 2d 725 - People v. Yant · 17 Cal. 2d 432 - Miller v. McColgan · Doble v. Superior Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'The association of persons with an honest intent is not conspiracy, and one of the tests on a conspiracy trial is, did the accused act in ignorance without criminal intent? In other words, did they honestly entertain a belief that they were not committing an unlawful act?'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““5. To commit any act injurious to the public health, to public morals, or to pervert or obstruct justice, or the due administration of the laws, “They are punishable as follows: “. . . When they conspire to do any of the other acts described in this section they shall be punishable by imprison ment in the county jail or state penitentiary not exceeding two years, or by a fine not exceeding $5,000, or both, and cases of such conspiracy may be prosecuted and tried in the superior court of any county in which any overt act tending to effect such conspiracy shall be done. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.