People v. Bateman’s Empirical Analysis
1943
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 1988
1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Newland · Asher v. State of Texas · 64 Cal. App. 375 - People v. Hinkle · People v. Pruitt · People v. Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . The law is established in California that the testimony of a duly qualified expert, such as Officer Boswell, is admissible to explain the significance of cryptic letters and figures which appear upon papers, books, and paraphernalia customarily used by bookmakers (People v. Hinkle, 64 Cal. App. 375, 378 [ 221 P. 693 ]; see also People v. Pruitt (1942), 55 Cal.App.2d 272, 277 [ 130 P.2d 767 ]). “In view of the fact that our Supreme Court has denied a hearing in the last cited ease any statements contained in People v. Davis (1941), 47 Cal.App.2d 331, 334 [117 P.2d 917], contrary to the rule of law above stated must be deemed to have been overruled. ...””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.