Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 COLO 238 - Green v. Hulse

Green v. Hulse’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
5
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2013

9 state decisions

4019141920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blinn v. . Schwarz · Patterson v. Hitchcock · French Lumbering Co. v. Theriault · Jamison v. Culligan · Ætna Life Insurance v. Sellers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * The distinction between a void and voidable instrument of insane persons was ignored. Persis Hulse had not been adjudged insane by any competent tribunal at the time she made the deed. The great weight of authority is, that deeds of persons in fact insane, but not so adjudged, are generally held to be voidable and not absolutely void, (citing cases)””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.