State v. Mills’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
55
cited by 55 later decisions
2
states following
January 2014
most recently cited
55 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Payton v. New York · Smith v. Phillips · Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · State v. Evans
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A prosecutor may not appeal to the emotions, passions and prejudices of the jurors. . . . [S]uch appeals should be avoided because they have the effect of diverting the jury's attention from [its] duty to decide the case on the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[A] prosecutor should not inject extraneous issues into the case that divert the jury from its duty to decide the case on the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.