Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 CONNAPP 636 - Funaro v. Baisley

Funaro v. Baisley’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sturman v. Socha · Office of Consumer Counsel v. Department of Public Utility Control · Thames River Recycling, Inc. v. Gallo · Sicaras v. City of Hartford · Scinto v. Sosin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A condition precedent is a fact or event which the parties intend must exist or take place before there is a right to performance. . . . A condition is distinguished from a promise in that it creates no right or duty in and of itself but is merely a limiting or modifying factor. . . . If the condition is not fulfilled, the right to enforce the contract does not come into existence.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “allow[s] the nonbreaching party to discharge his remaining duties of performance, and to initiate an action without having to await the time for performance.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[If] a statute does not define a term, it is appropriate to look to the common understanding expressed in the law and in dictionaries.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.