Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 F.1d 490 - Moller v. United States

Moller v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

57 F. 490 · 1893

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
January 1911
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 1911

3 federal appellate ·

30189319001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rector Etc of Holy Trinity Church v. United States · Leisy v. Hardin · Welton v. The State of Missouri · Leloup v. Port of Mobile · British Queen Mining Co. v. Baker Silver Mining Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The bill of exceptions, which purports to he a finding of facts, is nothing more than a recapitulation of conflicting evidence, where, as recited therein, some witnesses testified one way and others testified directly to flic contrary. It is neither a statement of facts by the parties nor a finding of facts by the court. Raimond v. Terrebonne Parish, 132 U. S. 192 , 10 Sup. Ct. 57 ; Glenn v. Fant, 134 U. S. 308 , 10 Sup. Ct. 583 ; Davenport v. Paris, 136 U. S. 580 , 10 Sup. Ct. 1064 : British Queen Min. Co. v. Baker Silver-Min. Co., 139 U. S. 222 , 11 Sup. Ct 323 . We suggest to the members of the bar in this circuit that an examination of those last-cited cases will be advantageous if hereafter, in common-law cases, they should desire to bring facts to this court for review.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““We suggest to the members of the bar in this circuit that an examination of these last-cited cases will be advantageous, if, hereafter, in common-law cases, they shall desire to bring facts to this court for review.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.