Danielson v. Donmopray’s Empirical Analysis
57 F.2d 565 · 1932
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 1977
1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad · The American Insurance Company v. 356 Bales of Cotton David Canter · Surplus Trading Co. v. Cook · Thompson v. Boisselier · Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. McGlinn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The jurisdiction of the federal court on removal is, in a limited sense, a derivative jurisdiction. If the state court lacks jurisdiction of the subject-matter or of the parties, the federal court acquires none, although it might in a like suit originally brought there have had jurisdiction.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the amount of damages to be recovered for causing the injury or death of any person.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.