Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 F.2d 611 - Burnet v. Marston

Burnet v. Marston’s Empirical Analysis

57 F.2d 611 · 1932

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
states following
May 2020
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently May 2020 · most notably Guedes v. Bureau Of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms (2019), Flood v. United States (1943)

18 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

901932194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Merriam · United States v. Fisher · Bowers v. New York & Albany Lighterage Co. · United States v. Updike · Bonwit Teller & Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Sec. 204. (a) That as used in this section the term ‘net loss’ means only net losses resulting from the operation of any trade or business regularly carried on by the taxpayer (including losses sustained from the sale or other disposition of real estate, machinery, and other capital assets, used in the conduct of such trade or business); and when so resulting means the excess of the deductions allowed by section 214 or 234. * * * “Sec. 214. (a) That in computing net income there shall be allowed as deductions: * * * “(4) Losses sustained during the taxable year and not compensated for by insurance or otherwise, if incurred in trade or business; “(5) Losses sustained during the taxable year and not compensated for by insurance or otherwise, if incurred in any transaction entered into for profit, though not connected with the trade or business. * * *” 42 Stat. 231 , 239.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “While the [agency] was clothed with authority to promulgate regulations, [it] was not authorized to add to or take from the plain language of the statute, for, 'where the intent is plain, nothing is left to construction.' " (quoting United States v. Fisher , 6 U.S. (2 Cranch) 358, 386, 2 L.Ed. 304 (1805) )). "Automatically”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.