Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 F.2d 672 - The Hartbridge

The Hartbridge’s Empirical Analysis

57 F.2d 672 · 1932

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
6
states following
September 2021
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 3 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably Dh Blair Co Inc Dh v. Gottdiener Dh J (2006), Florasynth, Inc. v. Pickholz (1984)

14 federal appellate · 3 district · 7 state decisions

1701932194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 9 U.S.C. § 9

Relies on Matter of Wilkins · Shores v. Bowen · In re the Arbitration of Picker · Gaines v. Clark · Hinkle v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] motion to confirm puts the other party to his objections. He cannot idly stand by, allow the award to be confirmed and judgment thereon entered, and then move to vacate the award just as though no judgment existed.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(t)here is authority for the proposition that even after the statutory period for moving to vacate an award has expired, a party may use the statutory grounds for vacation in defense of a motion to confirm.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Section 12 requires that notice of a motion to vacate an award must be served within three months after the award is filed or delivered, but there is nothing in such requirement to suggest that the winning party must refrain during that period from exercising the privilege conferred by section 9 to move “at any time” within the year [to confirm the award]. ... As we understand the statute, a motion to confirm puts the other party to his objections.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.