Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 F.2d 984 - Bliss v. Commissioner

Bliss v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

57 F.2d 984 · 1932

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
July 1978
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently July 1978 · most notably Southern Natural Gas Co. v. United States (1969), Jones' Estate v. Commissioner (1942)

17 federal appellate · 1 district ·

12019321940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kornhauser v. United States · Von Baumbach v. Sargent Land Co. · Wetherbee v. Railroad Lands Co. · Dalton v. Wickliffe · Lucas v. Wofford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * The defendants in those suits set up claims, not to title to lands admitted to be owned by the firm, but to rights to minerals therein or extracted therefrom. What was adversely claimed was part of what was or might be produced from the lands when used in business by the firm or its lessees. To treat as an addition to the cost of land the amount of an expenditure made, after ownership was acquired, to enable the owner, his agent or lesse, to possess and use the land for business purposes, undisturbed by intruders or trespassers, would involve a disregard of the difference between the cost of acquiring ownership of property and expenses paid or incurred to protect the owner’s right to undisturbed possession and enjoyment of his property, and what it yields or produces, by himself, his agents or lessees. It seems reasonable to treat amounts expended for services rendered in ejecting or excluding trespassers after ownership has been acquired as expenses incident to the ownership of property and the acquisition and enjoyment of income from it, rather than as additions to the capital investment in the property. * * [ 57 F.2d at 985 .]”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.