Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

57 F.3d 1067

Docket No. 94-7044.

United States v. Wright

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: May 23, 1995. Decided: June 14, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-06-14

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. Best

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-06-14

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Arlin Ernest Wright, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Kenneth Martin Sorenson, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, VA, for Appellee.

Before HAMILTON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Wright, Nos. CR-91-39; CA-93-540-R (W.D.Va. Aug. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We also deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel

/57/f3d/1067 · .json · Public domain