Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

57 F.3d 1067

Docket No. 94-7237.

Webb v. White

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: May 18, 1995. Decided: June 16, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-06-16

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United States v. Best

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-06-16

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Larry Webb, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, Office of The Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order* denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Webb v. White, No. CA-94-392 (E.D. Va. Sep. 30, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

The parties consented to trial by magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c)(2) (1988)

/57/f3d/1067 · .json · Public domain