Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 F.3d 1305 - Love v. Johnson

Love v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

57 F.3d 1305 · 1995

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
4
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently August 2021

12 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

1101995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2243 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs · Giglio v. United States · Teague v. Lane

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “entitled, in order to secure the basic right, to have the information he has sufficiently identified submitted to the trial court for in camera inspection and a properly reviewable judicial determination made whether any portions meet the [ Brady ] requirements for compulsory disclosure.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a defendant must make a 'plausible showing' that the Government's files contain information that 'would be both material and favorable to his defense.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “not only when it tends substantively to negate guilt but also when it tends to impeach the credibility of a key witness for the prosecution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.