Compagnie De Reassurance D'Ile de France v. New England Reinsurance Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
57 F.3d 56 · 1995
Citation profile
30 federal appellate · 26 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably T I Federal Credit Union v. DelBonis (1995), Provencher v. CVS Pharmacy, Division of Melville Corp. (1998)
30 federal appellate · 26 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. · Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[mjatters would have been different” had defendants "given incomplete, evasive, or incorrect answers to questions asked.” Id. at 80. 19 . By contrast, Massachusetts law does require life insurance and endowment insurance policies to attach a correct copy of the application in order for the application to be considered part of the policy. See Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 175, § 131 . 20 . For example, plaintiff takes issue with the word "irregularities” in Question 19(c), and submits that, under the broadest sense of that term, Heritage had literally hundreds, if not thousands, of "irregularities” over the three-year period preceding the application. If the inference to be drawn from this argument is that Question 19(c) was so overbroad that Heritage could not possibly have listed all such "irregularities” in the application, Heritage’s unequivocal response of "none”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“To date, the preponderance of the business has been assumed from First State Insurance Company and written on a pro rata basis. Non-System business represents a relatively small proportion of the total and what has been written is limited to Casualty business on an excess of loss basis emanating from Baccala and Shoop Insurance Services.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“plaintiffs must allege an 'acquisition' injury, analogous to the 'use or investment injury' required under § 1962(a) to show injury by reason of a § 1962(b) violation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.