Green v. Reynolds’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Gault · McCleskey v. Zant · Kent v. United States · Sawyer v. Whitley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]e review the district court's factual findings for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the unprecedented status of a constitutional orphan, denied protection against yet unknown and unincurred deprivations”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.