United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
57 F.3d 968 · 1995
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently January 2014 · most notably United States v. Wilson (1997), United States v. Lazcano-Villalobos (1999)
24 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 843 (§ 403 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Carolco Television Inc. v. National Broadcasting Co. · Gometz v. United States · United States v. Hooks · United States v. Fernandez · United States v. Chavez-Palacios
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We do not use this evaluation as a chance to second-guess the jury's credibility determinations, nor do we reassess the jury's conclusions about the weight of the evidence presented.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“consider[ing] the collective inferences to be drawn from the evidence as a whole.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“we evaluate the sufficiency of the evidence by”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.