Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 F.3d 980 - Goatcher v. Chater

Goatcher v. Chater’s Empirical Analysis

57 F.3d 980 · 1995

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
August 2007
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 7 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Shalala v. Schaefer · Melkonyan v. Sullivan · Bender v. Clark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In a suit challenging the denial of social security disability benefits, it is a judgment reversing and remanding a case to the Secretary for additional proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) that makes a plaintiff a prevailing party for purposes of the EAJA.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “EAJA fee applications in social security cases [must] be filed in the first instance in the district court,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Under EAJA, the prevailing party must apply for fees “within thirty days of final judgment in the action.” 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d)(1)(B). A “final judgment in the action” is “a judgment rendered by a court that terminates the civil action for which EAJA fees may be received,” Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 96 , 111 S.Ct. 2157, 2162 , 115 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991) (interpreting 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d)(1)(B)), and is made effective when it has been entered on a separate document in compliance with Fed. R.Civ.P. 58, Schaefer, 509 U.S. at 302-303, 113 S.Ct. at 2632. “The 30-day EAJA clock begins to run after the time to appeal that [effective] ‘final judgment’ has expired.” Melkonyan, 501 U.S. at 96 , 111 S.Ct. at 2162 ; see also Schaefer, 509 U.S. at 302, 113 S.Ct. at 2632 (EAJA’s thirty-day time limit runs from end of sixty-day period for appeal in social security case); 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d)(2)(G) (“ ‘final judgment’ means a judgment that is final and not appealable”); Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1) (when government is party to suit, judgment remains appealable for sixty days).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.