¶1 Alexander Cameron seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Cameron has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Cameron v. Gar-raghty, No. CA-01-1192-AM (E.D. Va., filed Oct. 9, 2002; entered Oct. 10, 2002). Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 DISMISSED.