Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

57 F. App'x 184

Johns v. Smith

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided March 13, 2003

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2003-03-13

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2003-03-13

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Joshua Bernard Johns appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2000), for failure to pay the partial filing fee. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johns v. Smith, No. CA-01-1270-AM (E.D.Va. filed Oct. 28, 2002; entered Oct. 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

/57/fappx/184 · .json · Public domain