Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

57 F. App'x 205

Gutknecht v. Baskerville

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided March 14, 2003

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2003-03-14

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Miller-El v. Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2003-03-14

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Christopher Colyn Gutknecht seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gut-knecht has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 1039-40, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 DISMISSED.

/57/fappx/205 · .json · Public domain