Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

57 F. App'x 715

Tschida v. Commissioner

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided March 10, 2003

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2003-03-10

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 2020

1 federal appellate ·

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6320 · 26 U.S.C. § 6330

Relies on Commissioner v. McCoy · Bueford v. Resolution Trust Corp.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-03-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Perry Tschida appeals the tax court’s1 dismissal of his amended petition for a lien or levy action under I.R.C. § 6320(c) or § 6330(d). Our de novo review persuades us that Tschida’s petition was untimely filed. See I.R.C. §§ 6330(d)(1), 7502; Bue-ford v. Resolution Trust Corp., 991 F.2d 481, 484 (8th Cir.1993) (standard of review). Because the untimely filing de*716prived the tax court of jurisdiction, and because the court may consider its jurisdiction on its own motion, we conclude that the tax court properly dismissed the petition. See Commissioner v. McCoy, 484 U.S. 3, 7, 108 S.Ct. 217, 98 L.Ed.2d 2 (1987) (per curiam); Bueford, 991 F.2d at 485; Raymond v. Commissioner, No 2354-01L, 2002 WL 31371975, 2002 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 48 at *5 & n. 3 (T.C. Oct. 22, 2002).

¶2Accordingly, we affirm.

¶3A true copy.

¶4. The Honorable Thomas B. Wells, Chief Judge of the United States Tax Court.

/57/fappx/715 · .json · Public domain