Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 FRD 149 - Prezzi v. Berzak

Prezzi v. Berzak’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
December 2017
most recently cited

4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently December 2017

4 district ·

6019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Haines v. Kerner · Wilma Prezzi v. Birg. Gen. L. J. Schelter · 326 F. Supp. 755 - Burton v. Peartree · Mottaghi-Iravani v. International Commodities Corp. · 325 F. Supp. 896 - Jannes v. Microwave Communications, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he Federal Rules of Civil Procedure envision a system of simplified pleadings that give notice of the general claim asserted, allow for the preparation of a basic defense, narrow the issues to be litigated, and provide a means for quick disposition of sham claims. Federal pleadings are designed for integration into a system of pre-trial motions, discovery and conferences, which further sharpen the claims to be litigated and which expedite the process of adjudication.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.