Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 F. Supp. 2d 321 - Johnson v. Garraghty

57 F. Supp. 2d 321 - Johnson v. Garraghty’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Dwight E. Freeman v. Warden Francis Corrections Officer Shoemaker Nurse Kent (1999), James Miller v. Larry Norris (2001)

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

200199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Farmer v. Brennan · United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · United States v. Turkette

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the term “civil action with respect to prison conditions” means any civil proceedings arising under Federal law with respect to the conditions of confinement or the effects of actions by government officials on the lives of persons confined in prison, but does not include habeas corpus proceedings challenging the fact or duration of confinement in prison.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[I]n any action brought pursuant to section 1983 of this title by an adult convicted of a crime confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility, the court shall, if the court believes that such a requirement would be appropriate and in the interest of justice, continue such case for a period of not to exceed 180 days in order to require exhaustion of such plain, speedy, and effective administrative remedies as are available.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under section 1983 ... by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.